Immunohistochemical Expression Profile of Cdk4 in Carcinoma Breast and Correlation to Clinicopathological Parameters- A Cross-Sectional Study
Keywords:
Breast cancer, lymph node metastasis, Cyclin Dependent Kinases (CDK-4), Lymphovasular invasion, perineural invasion, Molecular ClassificationAbstract
Breast carcinoma stands as the most commonly diagnosed cancer among women and is a leading contributor to cancer-related deaths in females. It is increasingly being identified at younger ages, with tumors that are often biologically aggressive and diagnosed at more advanced stages, thereby resulting in elevated mortality rates. In the context of personalized medicine, there is a pressing need to discover novel, effective prognostic and predictive biomarkers that are involved in the development and progression of breast cancer, as well as serve as potential therapeutic targets—particularly when considering the genetic variability among patients.
Among the many molecules and biomarkers implicated in the molecular pathogenesis of breast cancer, disruption of the cyclin D–cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) regulatory axis may shift cells away from senescence and promote a more proliferative behavior. Cancer cells may exploit multiple pathways to enhance cyclin D-associated CDK activity. CDKs, through their interaction with cyclin D proteins, play a crucial role in advancing the cell cycle and are considered promising targets for cancer treatment, including in breast tumors.
Despite this, previous research has shown mixed findings regarding the role of CDK4 in breast cancer, and only a limited number of studies have been conducted in the Indian population. Therefore, the current study was designed to investigate the immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of CDK4 in breast carcinoma and examine its association with various clinicopathological parameters and molecular subtypes. The objective is to evaluate its potential prognostic and predictive significance, which could support better patient classification and contribute to more personalized treatment approaches.
Methods
Seventy cases of invasive breast carcinoma in which 66 cases w ere mastectomy specimens and four cases of lumpectomy specimens received in the Department of Pathology between January 2021 to December 2024 were included in our cross-sectional study (retrospective and prospective). Immunohistochemical staining was done on these cases using Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK 4). IHC expression profiles (with specific staining scoring system) were correlated with clinicopathological parameters like age, tumor size, histopathological grading, lymph node metastasis, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion and adjacent ductal carcinoma in situ, estrogen- receptor (ER), Progesterone-receptor (PR) and Human-epidermal growth factor receptor-2 ( HER-2) expression and Ki-67 and molecular subtyping based on St. Gallen 2017 recommendation were done.
Results
CDK4 overexpression showed a statistically significant association with adverse prognostic parameters like patient group having lymph node metastasis (p=0.023) and perineural invasion (p=0.027). CDK4 overexpression also showed a statistically
significant association with ER (p=0.047), PR (p=0.034), Her/2 neu (p<0.001) and also association with four molecular subtypes with p =0. 05. Based on intensity of staining parameters, significant association noted between perineural invasion and ER, PR and HER2neu receptor expression status with more strong association with Her- 2neu group compared to ER, PR group.
Conclusion
Significant association of CDK- 4 expression, which belongs to cyclin- dependent kinase family, regulating cell cycle, noted with lymph node metastasis, peri neural invasion and hormone receptor expression along with molecular sub typed breast carcinomas. These findings significantly correlate CDK-4 expression with higher risk of metastasis and hence associated with aggressive prognosis. Therefore CDK- 4 can be used as a potential anti- cancer drug target for better prognosis of the patients specially in hormone receptor sensitive patients.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024:1‐35. doi:10.3322/caac.218342.
World Health Organisation (2021) The global cancer observatory, source: Globocan 2020, 356-india-fact-sheets.pdf. Factsheet-India. World Health Organisation.
https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/356-india-fact-sheets.pdf
Nandakumar A, Rath GK, Kataki AC, Bapsy PP, Gupta PC, Gangadharan P, Mahajan RC, Bandyopadhyay MN, Swamy K, Vallikad E, Visweswara RN, Roselind FS, Sathishkumar K, Kumar DDV, Jain A, Sudarshan KL. Decreased Survival With Mastectomy Vis-à-Vis Breast-Conserving Surgery in Stage II and III Breast Cancers: A Comparative Treatment Effectiveness Study. J Glob Oncol. 2016 Oct 12;3(4):304-313. doi: 10.1200/JGO.2016.004614. PMID: 28831438; PMCID: PMC5560451.
Mathew A, George PS, Kunnambath R, Mathew BS, Kumar A, Syampramod R, Booth CM. Educational Status, Cancer Stage, and Survival in South India: A Population-Based Study. JCO Glob Oncol. 2020 Nov;6:1704-1711. doi: 10.1200/GO.20.00259. PMID: 33156718; PMCID: PMC7713566.
Thu K.L., Soria-Bretones I., Mak T.W., Cescon D.W. Targeting the cell cycle in breast cancer: Towards the next phase. Cell Cycle. 2018;17:1871–1885. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2018.1502567.
Niu Y., Xu J., Sun T. Cyclin-Dependent Kinases 4/6 Inhibitors in Breast Cancer: Current Status, Resistance, and Combination Strategies. J. Cancer. 2019;10:5504–5517. doi: 10.7150/jca.32628.
Malumbres M. Cyclin-dependent kinases. Genome Biol. 2014;15:122. doi: 10.1186/gb4184.
Otto T., Sicinski P. Cell cycle proteins as promising targets in cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2017;17:93–115. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2016.138.
Rosai, J., Ackerman, L.V. and Rosai, J. (2011) Rosai and Ackerman’s Surgical Pathology. 10th Edition, Mosby, New York. P1six59-770
Muller K, Jorns JM, Tozbikian G. What's new in breast pathology 2022: WHO 5th edition and biomarker updates. J Pathol Transl Med. 2022 May;56(3):170-171. doi: 10.4132/jptm.2022.04.25. Epub 2022 May 15. PMID: 35581732; PMCID: PMC9119809.
Finn RS, Aleshin A, Slamon DJ. Targeting the cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) 4/6 in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res. 2016 Feb 9;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13058-015-0661-5. PMID: 26857361; PMCID: PMC4746893.
Hu Y, Gao J, Wang M, Li M. Potential Prospect of CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Jul 1;13:5223-5237. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S310649. PMID: 34234565; PMCID: PMC8257068.
Rakha EA, El-Sayed ME, Lee AH, et al. Prognostic significance of Nottingham histologic grade in invasive breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(19):3153-3158. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.15.5986
Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS, et al. Strategies for subtypes--dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(8):1736-1747. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdr304
Allred DC, Harvey JM, Berardo M, et al.Prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer by immunohistochemical analysis. Mod Pathol 1998;11:155 - 68.
Peurala E, Koivunen P, Haapasaari KM, Bloigu R, Jukkola-Vuorinen A. The prognostic significance and value of cyclin D1, CDK4 and p16 in human breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2013;15(1):R5. Published 2013 Jan 21. doi:10.1186/bcr3376
An HX, Beckmann MW, Reifenberger G, Bender HG, Niederacher D. Gene amplification and overexpression of CDK4 in sporadic breast carcinomas is associated with high tumor cell proliferation. Am J Pathol [Internet]. 1999;154(1):113–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65257-1
Finn RS, Aleshin A, Slamon DJ. Targeting the cyclin - dependent kinases ( CDK) 4/6 in estrogen receptor - positive breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res. 2009;18(1).
Guliyev M, Güren AK, Özge E, Çolak R, Majidova N, Şen A, et al. The Impact of Progesterone Receptor Status on Survival Outcomes in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Treated with First- Line CDK4 /6 Inhibitors. Cancers (Basel). 2025;17.
Dai M, Zhang C, Ali A, Hong X, Tian J, Lo C, et al. CDK4 regulates cancer stemness and is a novel therapeutic target for triple-negative breast cancer. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2016;6:35383. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep35383
Murphy CG, Dickler MN. The role of CDK4/6 inhibition in breast cancer. Oncologist [Internet]. 2015;20(5):483–90. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0443
Pavlovic D, Niciforovic D, Papic D, Milojevic K, Markovic M. CDK4/ 6 inhibitors: basics, pros, and major cons in breast cancer treatment with specific regard to cardiotoxicity - a narrative review. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2023;15.
Hu Y, Gao J, Wang M, Li M. Potential Prospect of CDK4 /6 Inhibitors in Triple- Negative Breast Cancer. Cancer Manag Res [Internet]. 2021;13:5223–37. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S310649
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.