Analysis Of Coronal Plane Knee Joint Alignment And Its Classification In The South Indian Population Using The Cpak System

Authors

  • Gautham. S
  • M. Praveen

Keywords:

Knee alignment, CPAK classification, South Indian population, total knee arthroplasty, kinematic alignment

Abstract

Background: Kinematic alignment (KA) in total knee replacement (TKR) aims to restore native joint anatomy, yet population-specific data remains limited for South Indians. The Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification categorizes knee phenotypes, but its applicability to South Indian populations with distinct biomechanics requires investigation.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 200 knees (150 patients) with advanced osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3/4) at a South Indian institution (2022-2024). Standardized full-limb radiographs were assessed by two surgeons using Surgimap software. CPAK classification was applied based on arithmetic Hip-Knee-Ankle angle (aHKA) and Joint Line Obliquity (JLO). Results were compared with Western cohorts.

Results: The cohort (mean age 62.4±8.7 years, 65% female) demonstrated: Predominant varus alignment (58% vs 43% Western; p<0.01) with mean aHKA -2.3°±3.5°. Steeper JLO (mean 172.7°±4.2° vs 175°-179° Western). Type II (varus/apex-distal) as most common phenotype (32% vs 21% Western; p=0.003). Higher prevalence of apex-distal JLO (64% vs Western norms). Excellent interobserver reliability (ICC 0.88-0.92)

Conclusions: South Indian osteoarthritic knees exhibit distinct CPAK distributions with predominant varus alignment and steeper joint line obliquity compared to Western populations. These findings suggest: Mechanical alignment TKR may overcorrect native anatomy. Kinematic alignment requires population-specific modifications. Implant designs should accommodate narrower femurs and variable JLO. The study highlights the need for ethnicity-specific TKR strategies to optimize outcomes in South Indian patients. Further research should correlate CPAK phenotypes with long-term implant survivorship.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

MacDessi SJ, Griffiths-Jones W, Harris IA, Bellemans J, Chen DB. The arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) predicts joint line obliquity after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2020 Mar;35(3):713-20. PMID: 31882345.

Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J. The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Mar;470(3):958-65. PMID: 22090357.

Tang Q, Zhou Y, Yang D, Xu H, Liu Q. The proportion of varus and valgus knees in Chinese osteoarthritis patients: a retrospective study based on robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Jun;29(6):1894-901. PMID: 32749632.

Howell SM, Shelton TJ, Hull ML. Implant survival and function ten years after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2023 Feb;105-B(2):112-20. PMID: 36722031.

Nedopil AJ, Singh AK, Howell SM, Hull ML. Does malalignment affect revision rate in total knee replacements with a medial pivot design? J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9):2845-51. PMID: 28438444.

Shetty GM, Mullaji A, Bhayde S, Nha KW, Oh HK. Factors contributing to inherent varus alignment of lower limb in normal Asian adults: role of tibial plateau inclination. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2014 Dec;22(3):323-7. PMID: 25550014.

Nakano N, Matsumoto T, Muratsu H, Takayama K, Kuroda R, Kurosaka M. Postoperative knee flexion angle is affected by lateral laxity in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2017 Dec;24(6):1362-9. PMID: 29054321.

Pal S, Besier TF, Draper CE, Fredericson M, Gold GE, Delp SL. Patellofemoral cartilage stresses are most sensitive to variations in vastus medialis muscle forces. J Biomech. 2020 Jan 23;98:109432. PMID: 31757321.

Courtney PM, Lee GC. Early outcomes of kinematic alignment in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Feb 17;103(4):321-30. PMID: 33587543.

Blakeney W, Clément J, Desmeules F, Hagemeister N, Rivière C, Vendittoli PA. Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty better reproduces normal gait than mechanical alignment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 May;27(5):1524-31. PMID: 30374590.

Hirschmann MT, Moser LB, Amsler F, Behrend H, Leclercq V, Hess S. Phenotyping the knee in young non-osteoarthritic knees shows a wide distribution of femoral and tibial coronal alignment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Apr;27(4):1355-63. PMID: 30374589.

Victor J, Ghijselings S, Tajdar F, Van Damme G, Deprez P, Arnout N. Joint line obliquity maintains kinematics in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Nov;26(11):3483-90. PMID: 29700585.

Thienpont E, Schwab PE, Cornu O, Bellemans J, Victor J. Bone morphotypes of the varus and valgus knee. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Mar;142(3):483-9. PMID: 33145678.

Lee YS, Howell SM, Won YY, Lee OS, Lee SH, Vahedi H. Kinematic alignment is a possible alternative to mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Jun;29(6):1849-57. PMID: 32621081.

Gill M, Gupta R, Jain V, Malhotra R, Khanna T. Do Indian knees differ from the western knees? A morphometric study of the distal femur and proximal tibia. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022 May;28:101849. PMID: 35402183.

Koh IJ, Lin CC, Patel NA, Chalmers CE, Maniglio M, Han SB. Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty reproduces native patellofemoral biomechanics during deep knee flexion. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Aug;28(8):2730-8. PMID: 31511986.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-24

How to Cite

1.
S G, Praveen M. Analysis Of Coronal Plane Knee Joint Alignment And Its Classification In The South Indian Population Using The Cpak System. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025May24 [cited 2025Oct.23];14(27S):390-6. Available from: https://mail.jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/6447