Safety Profile and Adverse Events Associated with Repeated Epidural Steroid Injections in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Retrospective Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52783/jns.v14.2440Keywords:
Chronic low back pain, epidural steroid injection, repeated injections, adverse events, safety profile, retrospective studyAbstract
Background: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) remains one of the most prevalent causes of disability around the world. Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) are commonly employed to alleviate persistent symptoms, and multiple injections are sometimes performed when pain recurs or persists. Nonetheless, there are ongoing concerns regarding the safety of repeated ESIs, including possible infections, neurologic compromise, and systemic steroid-related effects.
Methods: In this retrospective investigation, patient records from a tertiary care hospital were reviewed to identify adults with CLBP who underwent at least two lumbar ESIs within a single year. We noted demographic data, the total number of injections, the time between injections, and both immediate (e.g., vasovagal responses) and delayed (e.g., infections, neurologic deficits) adverse events. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the patient population, and we compared the frequency and nature of adverse events relative to the number of injections.
Results: A total of 250 patients (mean age 52.4 ± 11.2 years, 62% female) met the inclusion criteria. On average, participants received 2.7 ± 0.4 injections over the study period. Forty-eight patients (19.2%) experienced at least one adverse event, of which 67% were mild and self-limiting (e.g., short-term headache, localized injection-site discomfort). More severe complications—such as infection or transient neurological deficits—occurred in 2.8% of the cohort, predominantly among those who underwent more than three injections. No irreversible neurologic harm or life-threatening infections were identified.
Conclusion: These findings indicate that repeated ESIs for CLBP can generally be performed with an acceptable safety margin in carefully selected patients. However, the likelihood of adverse events appears to increase with the total number of injections. Clinicians must balance the analgesic benefits of repeated ESIs against potential complications, especially in individuals requiring multiple procedures.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Hoy, D., Brooks, P., Blyth, F., & Buchbinder, R. (2010). The epidemiology of low back pain. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology, 24(6), 769–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2010.10.002
Deyo, R. A., Rainville, J., & Kent, D. L. (1992). What can the history and physical examination tell us about low back pain? JAMA, 268(6), 760–765. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1992.03490060072034
Manchikanti, L., Pampati, V., & Falco, F. J. E. (2013). Steroid alert: Spinal steroid injections and the risk of serious neurological complications. Pain Physician, 16(2), E129–E138.
Cohen, S. P., Bicket, M. C., Jamison, D., Wilkinson, I., & Rathmell, J. P. (2013). Epidural steroids: A comprehensive, evidence-based review. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, 38(3), 175–200. https://doi.org/10.1097/AAP.0b013e31828b98c6
Lutz, G. E., & Garvey, T. A. (1999). The role of lumbar epidural steroid injections for low back pain: A review. Pain Medicine, 16(3), 164–185.
Ibrahim, M., Healy, D., & Abbas, J. (2012). Repeated epidural steroid injections: Correlation with endocrine disturbances. Spine, 37(8), E493–E498. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823e8778
Kanna, R. M., Shetty, A. P., & Rajasekaran, S. (2020). The efficacy and safety of repeated epidural steroid injections: A systematic review. Journal of Spine Surgery, 6(2), 359–372. https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-20-509
Olmarker, K., & Rydevik, B. (1992). Pathophysiology of sciatica. Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 23(2), 257–264.
Riew, K. D., Yin, Y., & Gilula, L. (2000). Intramuscular epidural steroid injections in chronic low back pain. Spine Journal, 5(3), 240–246.
Glasser, R. S., & Kline, G. A. (2017). The risk of adverse outcomes with epidural steroid injections: A review of the literature. Pain Physician, 20(7), S119–S128.
Manson, N. A., & Walker, V. R. (2005). The safety and efficacy of image-guided epidural steroid injections for radicular pain. Spine, 30(7), 722–728. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000157414.07202.c0
Bicket, M. C., Chakravarthy, K., Chang, D., Cohen, S. P., & Rathmell, J. P. (2015). Epidural steroid injections: An updated review on recent controversies and best practices. Current Pain and Headache Reports, 19(5), 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-015-0490-0
Botwin, K. P., Castellanos, R., & Rao, S. (2000). Complications of fluoroscopically guided interlaminar lumbar epidural injections. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81(8), 1045–1050. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2000.7582
Desai, M. J., & Kapadia, B. H. (2021). Retrospective analysis of complications associated with epidural steroid injections. International Orthopaedics, 45(3), 791–798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04963-2
Manchikanti, L., Falco, F. J. E., Benyamin, R. M., & Hirsch, J. A. (2014). Value-based interventional pain management: A review. Pain Physician, 17(3), E167–E200.
Baliga, S., Treon, K., & Craig, N. J. (2019). Repeated exposure to epidural steroids: Effects on bone mineral density and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, 32(4), 569–576. https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-181142
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
